The "structural risk" that hit Solana DeFi: The next issues highlighted by the Drift hacking

2026/04/04 10:00
Noriaki Yagi
SHARE
  • sns-x-icon
  • sns-facebook-icon
  • sns-line-icon
The "structural risk" that hit Solana DeFi: The next issues highlighted by the Drift hacking

The trap of "overly complex DeFi" that cost 43 billion yen.

image1

A massive hacking incident occurred in the Solana-based DeFi protocol "Drift." With estimated losses of up to $280 million (approximately 43 billion yen), the scale alone indicates a significant impact on the market. This incident provides a good opportunity to examine both the structural risks inherent in DeFi and its evolving direction.

First, let's clarify the facts. On April 1, 2026, an unusual outflow of funds was detected in the Solana-based perpetual trading platform, Drift. The estimated loss is at least $200 million, with some estimates suggesting it could reach up to $270 million. Approximately $150 million worth of JLP tokens were stolen in a single transaction, along with multiple other assets including SOL, USDC, and BTC-related assets (various wrapped tokens).

The attackers converted the stolen assets into USDC using the DEX aggregator Jupiter, bridged it to Ethereum, and then converted it to ETH. Large-scale ETH holdings have already been confirmed. The attack design, spanning multiple vaults, and the speed of fund transfers using cross-chain technology, are symbolic of the current DeFi environment.

Similar to previous incidents in the cryptocurrency space, this incident exposed the "vulnerability of complex financial designs." In recent years, DeFi has moved beyond simple token swaps, becoming a "pseudo-hedge fund" combining delta-neutral strategies, staking, and leverage structures. While the structures for generating returns have become sophisticated, the underlying risks have become harder to see. Even seemingly rational complex designs can quickly malfunction under extreme circumstances. As the USDX depegg incident demonstrated, the complexity of the design often amplifies liquidity crises.

Furthermore, a distinctive feature of this incident was the "cross-chain-based attack." Assets were instantly moved to different chains, dramatically increasing the difficulty of tracking and freezing them. This is the flip side of convenience, and a side effect of DeFi beginning to function as a global financial system.

The article is for members only. Please sign up to continue reading.

SHARE
  • sns-x-icon
  • sns-facebook-icon
  • sns-line-icon
Side Banner
Side Banner
MAGAZINE
Iolite Vol.19

Iolite Vol.19

May 2026 issueReleased on 2026/03/30

Interview Iolite FACE vol.19 Yuichiro Tamaki, Leader of the Democratic Party for the People PHOTO & INTERVIEW by Hasen Kuniyama Special Features: “Web3.0 The Impact Award 2026” “Global Money Loses Its Master” “The Current State of Robotics Technology” [Dialogue Series] The NISHI Talk: Crypto Conversations “The Changing Crypto Landscape, and the Unchanging Strategies of Traders” Kasou NISHI × European] Series: Tech and Future by Toshinao Sasaki, and more

MAGAZINE

Iolite Vol.19

May 2026 issueReleased on 2026/03/30
Interview Iolite FACE vol.19 Yuichiro Tamaki, Leader of the Democratic Party for the People PHOTO & INTERVIEW by Hasen Kuniyama Special Features: “Web3.0 The Impact Award 2026” “Global Money Loses Its Master” “The Current State of Robotics Technology” [Dialogue Series] The NISHI Talk: Crypto Conversations “The Changing Crypto Landscape, and the Unchanging Strategies of Traders” Kasou NISHI × European] Series: Tech and Future by Toshinao Sasaki, and more